Edmond v. United States
1997 United States Supreme Court case
1997 United States Supreme Court case
Edmond v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued February 24, 1997 Decided May 19, 1997 | |
Full case name | Jon E. Edmond v. United States |
Docket no. | 96-262 |
Citations | 520 U.S. 651 (more) 117 S. Ct. 1573; 137 L. Ed. 2d 917 |
Holding | |
Inferior officers are those who are supervised and directed by principal officers, that is, those officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer; Souter (Parts I and II) |
Concurrence | Souter (in part) |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const., Art. II, §2, cl. 2 |
Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States on the status of members of the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals under the Appointments Clause.
References
External links
- Text of Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
- v
- t
- e
United States Appointments Clause case law
Removal of Officers | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction stripping | |
---|---|
|
Ratification | |
---|---|
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e